16 patents currently held
Held is read from USPTO's recorded assignments; a transfer never recorded there does not appear.
The next term ends in Nov 2035. from the record
Free plan: 3 watched companies. Pro: unlimited.
Alerts on its grants, lapses and transfers.
0
Ending by 2030
Nov 2035
Next term end
7
Patent families
When these terms end
Held patents by the year their term ends
notable patents
all others
Updated Nov 14, 2026 · includes USPTO assignment & status data published Nov 14, 2026 and grant & fee data published Nov 10, 2026 (weekly) · how we know
Notable: the highest-ranked patents in this portfolio by citations and family size.
Notable patents
Ranked by citations and family size, against patents of the same kind granted the same year. How we rank
Notable
Ends Dec 2035 · High confidence
Also notable
Ends Aug 2036 · High confidence
Also notable
Ends Mar 2037 · High confidence
Distributed Package Management Using Meta-Scheduling
US 9,880,825
Granted 2018 and renewed at every maintenance window due so far. Protection runs to 2035.
Application Monitoring Using Workload Metadata
US 10,282,273
Granted 2019 and renewed at 2 of 3 maintenance windows. Protection runs to 2036.
Oversubscription Scheduling
US 10,733,023
The newest of the three, granted 2020. It anchors the portfolio to 2037, later than anything else here.
Fee deadlines
Maintenance fees fall due 3.5, 7.5 and 11.5 years after grant. A missed fee ends a patent at the end of the six month grace period that follows, not on the due date.
- 1 fee due Feb 15, 2027The maintenance fee for Application Monitoring Using Workload Metadata (US 11,726,896) comes due Feb 15, 2027. Unpaid by Aug 16, 2027, it lapses early.
- 1 fee due Apr 24, 2027The maintenance fee for Resolving Cluster Computing Task Interference (US 11,797,355) comes due Apr 24, 2027. Unpaid by Oct 25, 2027, it lapses early.
- 1 fee due Jun 17, 2027The maintenance fee for Distributed Package Management Using Meta-Scheduling (US 10,509,637) comes due Jun 17, 2027. Unpaid by Dec 17, 2027, it lapses early.
- 1 fee due Nov 7, 2027The maintenance fee for Distributed Package Management Using Meta-Scheduling (US 11,977,449) comes due Nov 7, 2027. Unpaid by May 8, 2028, it lapses early.
Recent changes
Nothing was recorded against this company's patents in the last 90 days.
What they patent
The 4 largest of its 7 families, grouped by real patent family and labeled by the earliest filing in each. No technology classification is inferred from titles.
| Distributed Package Management Using Meta-Scheduling | 4 in force | to Nov 2036 |
| Resolving Cluster Computing Task Interference | 3 in force | to May 2038 |
| Oversubscription Scheduling | 3 in force | to Jul 2037 |
| Application Monitoring Using Workload Metadata | 3 in force | to Aug 2036 |
Patents held now
Soonest term end first.
| Patent | Title | Status | Expires | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US 11,977,449 | Distributed Package Management Using Meta-Scheduling In force · Low confidence | In force | Low confidence | |
| US 9,880,825 | Distributed Package Management Using Meta-Scheduling In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 10,509,637 | Distributed Package Management Using Meta-Scheduling In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 9,823,915 | Software Container Format In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 10,282,273 | Application Monitoring Using Workload Metadata In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 11,220,688 | Oversubscription Scheduling In force · Medium confidence | In force | Medium confidence | |
| US 11,061,804 | Application Monitoring Using Workload Metadata In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 11,726,896 | Application Monitoring Using Workload Metadata In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 11,487,622 | Distributed Package Management Using Meta-Scheduling In force · Low confidence | In force | Low confidence | |
| US 10,733,023 | Oversubscription Scheduling In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence |
Sources and methods
Compiled from USPTO application file histories, grants and recorded assignments, with the company's own names reviewed by hand. How this record was built
Portfolio grouped automatically from ownership conveyances to the names matched to this company, usually every name that begins with its own, so it counts patents an affiliate holds; each list row names the holder of record. Security interests are excluded and ambiguous records are not reviewed by hand.
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.