31 patents currently held
Held is read from USPTO's recorded assignments; a transfer never recorded there does not appear.
2 more records may belong here and await a decision; they are not counted.
The next term ends in Feb 2029. from the record
Free plan: 3 watched companies. Pro: unlimited.
Alerts on its grants, lapses and transfers.
2
Ending by 2030
Feb 2029
Next term end
10
Patent families
When these terms end
Held patents by the year their term ends
notable patents
fee due within 90 days
all others
Updated Nov 14, 2026 · includes USPTO assignment & status data published Nov 14, 2026 and grant & fee data published Nov 10, 2026 (weekly) · how we know
Notable: the highest-ranked patents in this portfolio by citations and family size. Fee due within 90 days: a maintenance fee is due within 90 days of when this page was computed and not yet paid.
Notable patents
Ranked by citations and family size, against patents of the same kind granted the same year. How we rank
Notable
Ends May 2031 · High confidence
Also notable
Ends Mar 2032 · High confidence
Also notable
Ends Apr 2030 · High confidence
Generating a test scenario template from runs of test scenarios belonging to different organizations
US 9,934,134
The most cited patent in this portfolio, cited by 61 later US patents, top 5% of utility patents granted in 2018 in our data. Protection runs to 2031. A terminal disclaimer caps this term to an earlier patent's.
Method and System for Semiautomatic Execution of Functioning Test Scenario
US 8,522,083
Cited by 52 later US patents, top 25% of utility patents granted in 2013 in our data, and renewed at 3 of 3 maintenance windows. Protection runs to 2032.
Methods for Calculating a Combined Impact Analysis Repository
US 8,321,407
Renewed at every maintenance window since the 2012 grant; no more fees are due before its term ends in 2030.
Fee deadlines
Maintenance fees fall due 3.5, 7.5 and 11.5 years after grant. A missed fee ends a patent at the end of the six month grace period that follows, not on the due date.
- 1 fee due Dec 30, 2026The maintenance fee for Ranking runs of test scenarios based on number of different organizations executing a transaction (US 9,069,904) comes due Dec 30, 2026. Unpaid by Jun 30, 2027, it lapses early.
- 1 fee due Jan 28, 2027The maintenance fee for Rating Popularity of Clusters of Runs of Test Scenarios Based on Number of Different Organizations (US 9,092,579) comes due Jan 28, 2027. Unpaid by Jul 28, 2027, it lapses early.
- 2 fees due Feb 11, 2027
- 3 fees due Apr 27, 2027
- 5 fees due Jun 1, 2027
- 2 fees due Jul 12 to 19, 2027 · next Jul 12
- 3 fees due Oct 12 to 19, 2027 · next Oct 12
Recent changes
Nothing was recorded against this company's patents in the last 90 days.
What they patent
The 2 largest of its 10 families, grouped by real patent family and labeled by the earliest filing in each. No technology classification is inferred from titles.
| Method and System for Automatic Identification of Missing Test Scenarios | 21 in force | to Mar 2032 |
| Methods for Calculating a Combined Impact Analysis Repository | 2 in force | to Apr 2030 |
Patents held now
Soonest term end first.
| Patent | Title | Status | Expires | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US 8,700,606 | Methods for Calculating a Combined Impact Analysis Repository In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 8,321,407 | Methods for Calculating a Combined Impact Analysis Repository In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 9,032,360 | Selecting a test scenario template based on similarity of testing profiles belonging to different organizations In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 9,069,904 | Ranking runs of test scenarios based on number of different organizations executing a transaction In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 9,092,579 | Rating Popularity of Clusters of Runs of Test Scenarios Based on Number of Different Organizations In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 9,104,811 | Utilizing Testing Data Collected from Different Organizations to Generate Test Scenario Templates That Suit a User Profile In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 9,104,815 | Ranking runs of test scenarios based on unessential executed test steps In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 9,170,809 | Identifying transactions likely to be impacted by a configuration change In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 9,170,925 | Generating Test Scenario Templates from Subsets of Test Steps Utilized by Different Organizations In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence | |
| US 9,170,926 | Generating a configuration test based on configuration tests of other organizations In force · High confidence | In force | High confidence |
Also on record, not counted in the 31: 1 patent ended · 13 applications abandoned. List them
Sources and methods
Compiled from USPTO application file histories, grants and recorded assignments, with the company's own names reviewed by hand. How this record was built
Portfolio grouped automatically from ownership conveyances to the names matched to this company, usually every name that begins with its own, so it counts patents an affiliate holds; each list row names the holder of record. Security interests are excluded and ambiguous records are not reviewed by hand.
Fee due within 90 days marks a patent with a maintenance fee due within 90 days of the date this page was computed and not yet recorded paid, so it can end earlier than the bar shows. A fee left unpaid ends the patent at the close of the six month grace period that follows its due date, not on the due date itself. It is not a prediction that the fee will be missed.
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.