Term ends Mar 27, 2037 · High confidence
20-year base term ends Aug 29, 2036
Held by Bayer Healthcare LLC
Filed Mar 25, 2022 as application 17/704,280 · Granted Jul 2, 2024
Base term plus 210 days of patent term adjustment (USPTO delay)
Today
2016
2037
Clock starts
Aug 29, 2016
Aug 29, 2016
Term ends
Mar 27, 2037
Mar 27, 2037
Granted
Jul 2, 2024
Jul 2, 2024
base term
patent term adjustment
Updated Nov 15, 2026 · includes USPTO assignment & status data published Nov 15, 2026 and grant & fee data published Nov 10, 2026 (weekly) · how we know
210
Days of term adjustment
Read from the USPTO patent term adjustment record, not recalculated here.
None
Terminal disclaimer
No disclaimer on this record.
0 of 3
Maintenance fees paid
Three maintenance fees fall due, at 3.5, 7.5 and 11.5 years from grant. This counts the ones the record shows paid.
5
Family applications on record here
Applications sharing this one's continuity chain whose file history this site holds. The family may have others.
This patent's term runs 210 days past its 20-year base term on prosecution delay. 0 of 3 maintenance fees are paid so far. Confidence: High. from the record
How we calculated this date
One row per rule, each showing its own input and what it did to the date. A step we could not verify says so instead of resolving itself.
| Step | Input | Date after this step | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base term, 20 years from filing | Clock starts Aug 29, 2016, when application 15/249,667, the earliest non-provisional in its chain, was filed (this one was filed Mar 25, 2022) | Aug 29, 2036 | High confidence |
| Continuity chain | Every parent in the chain resolved | no change | High confidence |
| Patent term adjustment | +210 days, USPTO patent term adjustment record | Mar 27, 2037 | High confidence |
| Terminal disclaimer cap | None on record | no cap applied | High confidence |
| Patent term extension | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Fee events | 0 of 3 maintenance fees paid | In force | High confidence |
| Computed term end | The steps above, in order | Mar 27, 2037 | High confidence |
This family
| US 10,420,902 | In force Oct 2036 | Oct 2036 |
| US 10,039,889 | In force Aug 2036 | Aug 2036 |
| US 11,285,273 | In force Apr 2037 | Apr 2037 |
| US 12,023,475 | this patent Mar 2037 | Mar 2037 |
| Application 18/758,843 | Pending not computed | not computed |
The applications whose file history this site holds. The family may have others.
Assignments
Assignment documents as recorded at the USPTO, oldest first, with the reel and frame each was recorded at. A recorded assignment is a filed document, not a statement of current ownership, and the absence of a later one is not evidence that the last one still stands.
| Recorded | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2022 Reel 60227, frame 492 | Cowan, Kevin; Spohn, Michael; McDermott, Michael | Bayer Healthcare LLC | Assignment of Assignor's Interest |
Sources
Google Patents · The patent document at USPTO · Assignment records at USPTO
USPTO account required: This application in Patent Center · USPTO's maintenance fee lookup
Maintenance fee events come from USPTO's own fee records. Its fee lookup asks for the patent number and the application number.
Free plan: 3 watched companies. Pro: unlimited.
Alerts on its grants, lapses and transfers.
What's changing
Mar 2037
Term ends Mar 27, 2037. Maintenance fees still fall due before then
Note
The 210 days of patent term adjustment (USPTO delay) are read from the USPTO record, not recalculated by us
Citations
1
later US patent cites this one
Fewer than half of the utility patents granted in 2024 in our data have been cited yet, so we show the count and do not rank on it.
How we rank
Every date shows its work: the base term, any term adjustment or extension, any disclaimer cap, and the maintenance fee record, each with a confidence tier. How this record was built
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.
In force means the term is running and no lapse is on record. It is not a finding that the patent is valid.