Term ends Apr 12, 2040 · Medium confidence
20-year base term ends Aug 23, 2039
Why Medium: A parent in the chain could not be resolved.
Held by Arrcus Inc.
Filed May 23, 2023 as application 18/322,340 · Granted Jun 9, 2026
Base term plus 233 days of patent term adjustment (USPTO delay)
Today
2019
2040
Clock starts
Aug 23, 2019
Aug 23, 2019
Term ends
Apr 12, 2040
Apr 12, 2040
Granted
Jun 9, 2026
Jun 9, 2026
base term
patent term adjustment
Updated Nov 14, 2026 · includes USPTO assignment & status data published Nov 14, 2026 and grant & fee data published Nov 10, 2026 (weekly) · how we know
233
Days of term adjustment
Read from the USPTO patent term adjustment record, not recalculated here.
None
Terminal disclaimer
No disclaimer on this record.
0 of 3
Maintenance fees paid
Three maintenance fees fall due, at 3.5, 7.5 and 11.5 years from grant. This counts the ones the record shows paid.
3
Family applications on record here
Applications sharing this one's continuity chain whose file history this site holds. The family may have others.
This patent's term runs 233 days past its 20-year base term on prosecution delay. 0 of 3 maintenance fees are paid so far. Confidence: Medium. from the record
How we calculated this date
One row per rule, each showing its own input and what it did to the date. A step we could not verify says so instead of resolving itself.
| Step | Input | Date after this step | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base term, 20 years from filing | Clock starts Aug 23, 2019, when application 16/549,315, the earliest non-provisional in its chain, was filed (this one was filed May 23, 2023); a parent in its chain could not be resolved (the next row) | Aug 23, 2039 | High confidence |
| Continuity chain | A parent in the chain could not be resolved | dated from this application's own claim | Medium confidence |
| Patent term adjustment | +233 days, USPTO patent term adjustment record | Apr 12, 2040 | High confidence |
| Terminal disclaimer cap | None on record | no cap applied | High confidence |
| Patent term extension | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Fee events | 0 of 3 maintenance fees paid | In force | High confidence |
| Computed term end | The steps above, in order | Apr 12, 2040 | Medium confidence |
This family
| US 11,140,070 | In force Aug 2039 | Aug 2039 |
| US 11,693,716 | In force Aug 2039 | Aug 2039 |
| US 12,652,192 | this patent Apr 2040 | Apr 2040 |
The applications whose file history this site holds. The family may have others.
Assignments
Assignment documents as recorded at the USPTO, oldest first, with the reel and frame each was recorded at. A recorded assignment is a filed document, not a statement of current ownership, and the absence of a later one is not evidence that the last one still stands.
| Recorded | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2023 Reel 63734, frame 392 | Sarkar, Pushpasis; Patel, Keyur; Yeung, Derek Man-kit; Patel, Alpesh; Kreeger, Lawrence Rolfe | Arrcus Inc. | Assignment of Assignor's Interest |
Sources
Google Patents · The patent document at USPTO · Assignment records at USPTO
USPTO account required: This application in Patent Center · USPTO's maintenance fee lookup
Maintenance fee events come from USPTO's own fee records. Its fee lookup asks for the patent number and the application number.
Free plan: 3 watched companies. Pro: unlimited.
Alerts on its grants, lapses and transfers.
What's changing
Apr 2040
Term ends Apr 12, 2040. Maintenance fees still fall due before then
Note
The 233 days of patent term adjustment (USPTO delay) are read from the USPTO record, not recalculated by us
Citations
We have no citation count for this patent yet. That is not the same as never having been cited.
Every date shows its work: the base term, any term adjustment or extension, any disclaimer cap, and the maintenance fee record, each with a confidence tier. How this record was built
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.
In force means the term is running and no lapse is on record. It is not a finding that the patent is valid.