Term ends May 6, 2027 · High confidence
20-year base term ends Mar 8, 2027
Held by Aesculap AG
Filed Nov 25, 2008 as application 12/323,309 · Granted Jul 13, 2010
Base term plus 59 days of patent term adjustment (USPTO delay)
Today
2007
2027
Clock starts
Mar 8, 2007
Mar 8, 2007
Term ends
May 6, 2027
May 6, 2027
Granted
Jul 13, 2010
Jul 13, 2010
base term
patent term adjustment
fee events
Updated Nov 14, 2026 · includes USPTO assignment & status data published Nov 14, 2026 and grant & fee data published Nov 10, 2026 (weekly) · how we know
59
Days of term adjustment
Read from the USPTO patent term adjustment record, not recalculated here.
None
Terminal disclaimer
No disclaimer on this record.
3 of 3
Maintenance fees paid
Three maintenance fees fall due, at 3.5, 7.5 and 11.5 years from grant. This counts the ones the record shows paid.
4
Family applications on record here
Applications sharing this one's continuity chain whose file history this site holds. The family may have others.
This patent's term runs 59 days past its 20-year base term on prosecution delay. All three maintenance fees are recorded paid; no more fees are due. Confidence: High. from the record
How we calculated this date
One row per rule, each showing its own input and what it did to the date. A step we could not verify says so instead of resolving itself.
| Step | Input | Date after this step | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base term, 20 years from filing | Clock starts Mar 8, 2007, when application 11/672,858, the earliest non-provisional in its chain, was filed (this one was filed Nov 25, 2008) | Mar 8, 2027 | High confidence |
| Continuity chain | Every parent in the chain resolved | no change | High confidence |
| Patent term adjustment | +59 days, USPTO patent term adjustment record | May 6, 2027 | High confidence |
| Terminal disclaimer cap | None on record | no cap applied | High confidence |
| Patent term extension | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Fee events | 3 of 3 maintenance fees paid | In force | High confidence |
| Computed term end | The steps above, in order | May 6, 2027 | High confidence |
This family
| US 7,473,258 | In force Apr 2027 | Apr 2027 |
| US 7,533,790 | In force May 2027 | May 2027 |
| US 7,753,250 | this patent May 2027 | May 2027 |
| US 8,066,720 | In force Apr 2027 | Apr 2027 |
The applications whose file history this site holds. The family may have others.
Assignments
Assignment documents as recorded at the USPTO, oldest first, with the reel and frame each was recorded at. A recorded assignment is a filed document, not a statement of current ownership, and the absence of a later one is not evidence that the last one still stands.
| Recorded | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2016 Reel 40590, frame 152 | Cardica, Inc. | Dextera Surgical Inc. | Change of Name |
| Apr 9, 2018 Reel 45870, frame 478 | Dextera Surgical Inc. | Aesdex, LLC | Assignment of Assignor's Interest |
| Apr 9, 2018 Reel 45870, frame 567 | Aesdex, LLC | Aesculap AG | Asset Purchase Agreement |
Sources
Google Patents · The patent document at USPTO · Assignment records at USPTO
USPTO account required: This application in Patent Center · USPTO's maintenance fee lookup
Maintenance fee events come from USPTO's own fee records. Its fee lookup asks for the patent number and the application number.
Free plan: 3 watched companies. Pro: unlimited.
Alerts on its grants, lapses and transfers.
What's changing
May 2027
Term ends May 6, 2027. No further fees fall due before then
Note
The 59 days of patent term adjustment (USPTO delay) are read from the USPTO record, not recalculated by us
Citations
215
later US patents cite this one
That is top 5% of utility patents granted in 2010 in our data, the only group it is compared against.
How we rank
Every date shows its work: the base term, any term adjustment or extension, any disclaimer cap, and the maintenance fee record, each with a confidence tier. How this record was built
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.
In force means the term is running and no lapse is on record. It is not a finding that the patent is valid.