Also listed on Yanicklo Technology Limited Liability Company, an earlier holder on the record. The recorded assignments below show how it moved.
Term ends Jun 12, 2030 · High confidence
20-year base term ends Jun 24, 2029
Held by Tamiras per Pte. Ltd., LLC
Filed Jun 24, 2009 as application 12/490,981 · Granted Jan 29, 2013
Base term plus 353 days of patent term adjustment (USPTO delay)
Today
2009
2030
Clock starts
Jun 24, 2009
Jun 24, 2009
Term ends
Jun 12, 2030
Jun 12, 2030
Granted
Jan 29, 2013
Jan 29, 2013
base term
patent term adjustment
fee events
Updated Nov 14, 2026 · includes USPTO assignment & status data published Nov 14, 2026 and grant & fee data published Nov 10, 2026 (weekly) · how we know
353
Days of term adjustment
Read from the USPTO patent term adjustment record, not recalculated here.
None
Terminal disclaimer
No disclaimer on this record.
3 of 3
Maintenance fees paid
Three maintenance fees fall due, at 3.5, 7.5 and 11.5 years from grant. This counts the ones the record shows paid.
This patent's term runs 353 days past its 20-year base term on prosecution delay. All three maintenance fees are recorded paid; no more fees are due. Confidence: High. from the record
How we calculated this date
One row per rule, each showing its own input and what it did to the date. A step we could not verify says so instead of resolving itself.
| Step | Input | Date after this step | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base term, 20 years from filing | Clock starts Jun 24, 2009, when this application, 12/490,981, was filed | Jun 24, 2029 | High confidence |
| Continuity chain | Every parent in the chain resolved | no change | High confidence |
| Patent term adjustment | +353 days, USPTO patent term adjustment record | Jun 12, 2030 | High confidence |
| Terminal disclaimer cap | None on record | no cap applied | High confidence |
| Patent term extension | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Fee events | 3 of 3 maintenance fees paid | In force | High confidence |
| Computed term end | The steps above, in order | Jun 12, 2030 | High confidence |
Assignments
Assignment documents as recorded at the USPTO, oldest first, with the reel and frame each was recorded at. A recorded assignment is a filed document, not a statement of current ownership, and the absence of a later one is not evidence that the last one still stands.
| Recorded | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2009 Reel 23140, frame 421 | Matias, Yossi; Shaked, Guy; Braverman, Vladimir; Belyaev, Victor; Golan, Shahar; Sadetsky, Marina | Hyperroll Israel Ltd. | Assignment of Assignor's Interest |
| Oct 27, 2009 Reel 23427, frame 597 | Hyperroll, Inc. | Hyperion Solutions Corporation | License |
| Nov 10, 2009 Reel 23486, frame 795 | Hyperroll Israel, Ltd. | Hyperroll, Inc. | Assignment of Assignor's Interest |
| Jan 28, 2010 Reel 23861, frame 460 | Hyperroll, Inc. | HR Asset Holdings, Inc. | Change of Name |
| Apr 21, 2010 Reel 24266, frame 294 | HR Asset Holdings, Inc. | Yanicklo Technology Limited Liability Company | Assignment of Assignor's Interest |
| Nov 2, 2015 Reel 36938, frame 644 | Yanicklo Technology, L.l.c. | Tamiras per Pte. Ltd., LLC | Merger |
Sources
Google Patents · The patent document at USPTO · Assignment records at USPTO
USPTO account required: This application in Patent Center · USPTO's maintenance fee lookup
Maintenance fee events come from USPTO's own fee records. Its fee lookup asks for the patent number and the application number.
What's changing
Jun 2030
Term ends Jun 12, 2030. No further fees fall due before then
Note
The 353 days of patent term adjustment (USPTO delay) are read from the USPTO record, not recalculated by us
Citations
9
later US patents cite this one
That is above the median of utility patents granted in 2013 in our data, the only group it is compared against.
How we rank
Every date shows its work: the base term, any term adjustment or extension, any disclaimer cap, and the maintenance fee record, each with a confidence tier. How this record was built
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.
In force means the term is running and no lapse is on record. It is not a finding that the patent is valid.