Term ends May 25, 2032 · High confidence
20-year base term ends Nov 16, 2031
Held by Multi-Flex Circuits Pty., Ltd.
Filed Nov 16, 2011 as application 13/297,348 · Granted Jan 7, 2014
Base term plus 191 days of patent term adjustment (USPTO delay)
Today
2011
2032
Clock starts
Nov 16, 2011
Nov 16, 2011
Term ends
May 25, 2032
May 25, 2032
Granted
Jan 7, 2014
Jan 7, 2014
base term
patent term adjustment
fee events
Updated Nov 14, 2026 · includes USPTO assignment & status data published Nov 14, 2026 and grant & fee data published Nov 10, 2026 (weekly) · how we know
191
Days of term adjustment
Read from the USPTO patent term adjustment record, not recalculated here.
None
Terminal disclaimer
No disclaimer on this record.
3 of 3
Maintenance fees paid
Three maintenance fees fall due, at 3.5, 7.5 and 11.5 years from grant. This counts the ones the record shows paid.
This patent's term runs 191 days past its 20-year base term on prosecution delay. All three maintenance fees are recorded paid; no more fees are due. Confidence: High. from the record
How we calculated this date
One row per rule, each showing its own input and what it did to the date. A step we could not verify says so instead of resolving itself.
| Step | Input | Date after this step | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base term, 20 years from filing | Clock starts Nov 16, 2011, when this application, 13/297,348, was filed | Nov 16, 2031 | High confidence |
| Continuity chain | Every parent in the chain resolved | no change | High confidence |
| Patent term adjustment | +191 days, USPTO patent term adjustment record | May 25, 2032 | High confidence |
| Terminal disclaimer cap | None on record | no cap applied | High confidence |
| Patent term extension | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Fee events | 3 of 3 maintenance fees paid | In force (reinstated) | High confidence |
| Computed term end | The steps above, in order | May 25, 2032 | High confidence |
Assignments
Assignment documents as recorded at the USPTO, oldest first, with the reel and frame each was recorded at. A recorded assignment is a filed document, not a statement of current ownership, and the absence of a later one is not evidence that the last one still stands.
| Recorded | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2012 Reel 27544, frame 163 | Norair, John Peter | Blackbird Technology Holdings, Inc. | Assignment of Assignor's Interest |
| Jan 8, 2019 Reel 47936, frame 105 | Blackbird Technology Holdings, Inc., Now Known as Haystack Technologies, Inc. | Multi-Flex Circuits Pty Ltd. | Security Interest |
| Oct 28, 2019 Reel 50848, frame 126 | Blackbird Technology Holdings, Inc. | McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd. | Security Interest |
| Feb 14, 2020 Reel 51936, frame 269 | Blackbird Technology Holdings, Inc., Now Known as Haystack Technologies, Inc. | Multi-Flex Circuits Pty Ltd. | Security Interest |
| Apr 2, 2020 Reel 52311, frame 240 | Blackbird Technology Holdings, Inc., Now Known as Haystack Technologies, Inc. | Multi-Flex Circuits Pty., Ltd. | Assignment of Assignor's Interest |
Sources
Google Patents · The patent document at USPTO · Assignment records at USPTO
USPTO account required: This application in Patent Center · USPTO's maintenance fee lookup
Maintenance fee events come from USPTO's own fee records. Its fee lookup asks for the patent number and the application number.
Free plan: 3 watched companies. Pro: unlimited.
Alerts on its grants, lapses and transfers.
What's changing
May 2032
Term ends May 25, 2032. No further fees fall due before then
Note
The 191 days of patent term adjustment (USPTO delay) are read from the USPTO record, not recalculated by us
Citations
24
later US patents cite this one
That is top 25% of utility patents granted in 2014 in our data, the only group it is compared against.
How we rank
Every date shows its work: the base term, any term adjustment or extension, any disclaimer cap, and the maintenance fee record, each with a confidence tier. How this record was built
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.
In force means the term is running and no lapse is on record. It is not a finding that the patent is valid.