Term ends Feb 8, 2032 · High confidence
20-year base term ends Feb 8, 2032
Held by ABL IP Holding LLC
Filed Feb 8, 2012 as application 13/369,144 · Granted Mar 15, 2016
Base term, 20 years from filing
Today
2012
2032
Clock starts
Feb 8, 2012
Feb 8, 2012
Term ends
Feb 8, 2032
Feb 8, 2032
Granted
Mar 15, 2016
Mar 15, 2016
base term
fee events
Updated Nov 14, 2026 · includes USPTO assignment & status data published Nov 14, 2026 and grant & fee data published Nov 10, 2026 (weekly) · how we know
None
Term adjustment
No prosecution delay on this record.
None
Terminal disclaimer
No disclaimer on this record.
2 of 3
Maintenance fees paid
Three maintenance fees fall due, at 3.5, 7.5 and 11.5 years from grant. This counts the ones the record shows paid.
48
Family applications on record here
Applications sharing this one's continuity chain whose file history this site holds. The family may have others.
This patent's term is its 20-year base term, with no adjustment for prosecution delay. 2 of 3 maintenance fees are paid so far. Confidence: High. from the record
How we calculated this date
One row per rule, each showing its own input and what it did to the date. A step we could not verify says so instead of resolving itself.
| Step | Input | Date after this step | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base term, 20 years from filing | Clock starts Feb 8, 2012, when this application, 13/369,144, was filed | Feb 8, 2032 | High confidence |
| Continuity chain | Every parent in the chain resolved | no change | High confidence |
| Patent term adjustment | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Terminal disclaimer cap | None on record | no cap applied | High confidence |
| Patent term extension | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Fee events | 2 of 3 maintenance fees paid | In force | High confidence |
| Computed term end | The steps above, in order | Feb 8, 2032 | High confidence |
This family
| US 8,964,016 | In force Feb 2032 | Feb 2032 |
| US 9,287,976 | this patent Feb 2032 | Feb 2032 |
| US 8,866,391 | In force May 2032 | May 2032 |
| US 8,248,467 | In force Feb 2032 | Feb 2032 |
| Application 13/435,448 | Abandoned not computed | not computed |
| Application 13/445,019 | Abandoned not computed | not computed |
| US 8,947,513 | In force Feb 2032 | Feb 2032 |
| US 8,994,799 | In force Feb 2032 | Feb 2032 |
8 of 48 applications in this family shown, earliest filings first. The applications whose file history this site holds. The family may have others.
Assignments
Assignment documents as recorded at the USPTO, oldest first, with the reel and frame each was recorded at. A recorded assignment is a filed document, not a statement of current ownership, and the absence of a later one is not evidence that the last one still stands.
| Recorded | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2012 Reel 27884, frame 302 | Ganick, Aaron; Ryan, Daniel | Bytelight, Inc. | Assignment of Assignor's Interest |
| Apr 28, 2015 Reel 35511, frame 637 | Bytelight, Inc. | ABL IP Holding LLC | Assignment of Assignor's Interest |
Sources
Google Patents · The patent document at USPTO · Assignment records at USPTO
USPTO account required: This application in Patent Center · USPTO's maintenance fee lookup
Maintenance fee events come from USPTO's own fee records. Its fee lookup asks for the patent number and the application number.
Free plan: 3 watched companies. Pro: unlimited.
Alerts on its grants, lapses and transfers.
What's changing
Feb 2032
Term ends Feb 8, 2032. Maintenance fees still fall due before then
Citations
112
later US patents cite this one
That is top 5% of utility patents granted in 2016 in our data, the only group it is compared against.
How we rank
Every date shows its work: the base term, any term adjustment or extension, any disclaimer cap, and the maintenance fee record, each with a confidence tier. How this record was built
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.
In force means the term is running and no lapse is on record. It is not a finding that the patent is valid.