Term ends Apr 9, 2027 · High confidence
Held by Signify Holding B.V.
Filed Apr 6, 2011 as application 29/389,074 · Granted Apr 9, 2013
Base term, 14 years from grant
Today
2013
2027
Clock starts
Apr 9, 2013
Apr 9, 2013
Term ends
Apr 9, 2027
Apr 9, 2027
base term
Updated Nov 14, 2026 · includes USPTO assignment & status data published Nov 14, 2026 and grant & fee data published Nov 10, 2026 (weekly) · how we know
None
Term adjustment
No prosecution delay on this record.
None
Terminal disclaimer
No disclaimer on this record.
14 years from grant
Base term
No maintenance fees are payable on this kind of patent.
7
Family applications on record here
Applications sharing this one's continuity chain whose file history this site holds. The family may have others.
This patent's term is its base term, 14 years from grant, with no adjustment for prosecution delay. No maintenance fees are payable on this kind of patent. Confidence: High. from the record
How we calculated this date
One row per rule, each showing its own input and what it did to the date. A step we could not verify says so instead of resolving itself.
| Step | Input | Date after this step | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base term, 14 years from grant | Granted Apr 9, 2013 | Apr 9, 2027 | High confidence |
| Continuity chain | Every parent in the chain resolved | no change | High confidence |
| Patent term adjustment | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Terminal disclaimer cap | None on record | no cap applied | High confidence |
| Patent term extension | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Computed term end | The steps above, in order | Apr 9, 2027 | High confidence |
This family
| US 7,954,980 | In force Jun 2029 | Jun 2029 |
| US 8,430,529 | In force Feb 2030 | Feb 2030 |
| US D636,915 | Term ended Apr 2025 | Apr 2025 |
| US D679,846 | this patent Apr 2027 | Apr 2027 |
| US 8,303,142 | In force Mar 2029 | Mar 2029 |
| US 8,721,120 | In force Mar 2029 | Mar 2029 |
| US 9,046,231 | In force Mar 2029 | Mar 2029 |
The applications whose file history this site holds. The family may have others.
Assignments
Assignment documents as recorded at the USPTO, oldest first, with the reel and frame each was recorded at. A recorded assignment is a filed document, not a statement of current ownership, and the absence of a later one is not evidence that the last one still stands.
| Recorded | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2011 Reel 26088, frame 861 | Bryant, Christopher Michael; Christ, James Richard | Cooper Technologies Company | Assignment of Assignor's Interest |
| Feb 1, 2019 Reel 48207, frame 819 | Cooper Technologies Company | Eaton Intelligent Power Limited | Assignment of Assignor's Interest |
| Mar 11, 2019 Reel 48655, frame 114 | Cooper Technologies Company | Eaton Intelligent Power Limited | Corrective Assignment to Correct the Cover Sheet to Remove Application No. 15567271 Previously Recorded on Reel 048207 Frame 0819. Assignor(S) Hereby Confirms the Assignment. |
| May 7, 2020 Reel 52598, frame 899 | Eaton Intelligent Power Limited | Signify Holding B.V. | Assignment of Assignor's Interest |
Sources
Google Patents · The patent document at USPTO · Assignment records at USPTO
USPTO account required: This application in Patent Center
No maintenance fees are payable on this kind of patent, so the record carries no fee events.
Free plan: 3 watched companies. Pro: unlimited.
Alerts on its grants, lapses and transfers.
What's changing
Apr 2027
Term ends Apr 9, 2027. No maintenance fees are payable on this kind of patent
Citations
3
later US patents cite this one
That is below the median of design patents granted in 2013 in our data, the only group it is compared against.
How we rank
Every date shows its work: the base term, any term adjustment or extension, any disclaimer cap, and the maintenance fee record, each with a confidence tier. How this record was built
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.
In force means the term is running and no lapse is on record. It is not a finding that the patent is valid.