Collateral for a security interest recorded Dec 12, 2016 (The Privatebank and Trust Company).
Term ends Jan 31, 2032 · High confidence
Held by Raffel Systems, LLC
Filed Sep 29, 2015 as application 29/540,928 · Granted Jan 31, 2017
Base term, 15 years from grant
Today
2017
2032
Clock starts
Jan 31, 2017
Jan 31, 2017
Term ends
Jan 31, 2032
Jan 31, 2032
base term
Updated Nov 14, 2026 · includes USPTO assignment & status data published Nov 14, 2026 and grant & fee data published Nov 10, 2026 (weekly) · how we know
None
Term adjustment
No prosecution delay on this record.
None
Terminal disclaimer
No disclaimer on this record.
15 years from grant
Base term
No maintenance fees are payable on this kind of patent.
This patent's term is its base term, 15 years from grant, with no adjustment for prosecution delay. No maintenance fees are payable on this kind of patent. Confidence: High. from the record
How we calculated this date
One row per rule, each showing its own input and what it did to the date. A step we could not verify says so instead of resolving itself.
| Step | Input | Date after this step | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base term, 15 years from grant | Granted Jan 31, 2017 | Jan 31, 2032 | High confidence |
| Continuity chain | Every parent in the chain resolved | no change | High confidence |
| Patent term adjustment | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Terminal disclaimer cap | None on record | no cap applied | High confidence |
| Patent term extension | None on file | no change | High confidence |
| Computed term end | The steps above, in order | Jan 31, 2032 | High confidence |
Assignments
Assignment documents as recorded at the USPTO, oldest first, with the reel and frame each was recorded at. A recorded assignment is a filed document, not a statement of current ownership, and the absence of a later one is not evidence that the last one still stands.
| Recorded | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2015 Reel 36973, frame 560 | Seidl, Kenneth G.; Santy, Torrin T. | Raffel Systems, LLC | Assignment of Assignor's Interest |
| Dec 12, 2016 Reel 40883, frame 956 | Raffel Systems, LLC | The Privatebank and Trust Company | Security Interest |
| Aug 13, 2019 Reel 50040, frame 962 | Raffel Systems, LLC | East West Bank | Security Interest |
| Aug 14, 2019 Reel 50051, frame 361 | Cibc Bank USA, as Successor to the Privatebank and Trust Company | Raffel Systems, LLC | Release of Security Interest |
| Dec 15, 2021 Reel 58518, frame 348 | Innovative Motion Technologies, LLC; Raffel Systems, LLC; Micro-Air, LLC | Cibc Bank USA, as Agent | Security Interest |
| Jun 13, 2022 Reel 60346, frame 177 | East West Bank | Raffel Systems, LLC. | Release of Security Interest |
| May 14, 2024 Reel 67410, frame 134 | Raffel Systems, LLC; Micro-Air, LLC; Ma Imt Hold Co., LLC; Check Technology Solutions LLC; Innovative Motion Technologies, LLC | Cibc Bank USA, as Agent | Security Interest |
| Mar 24, 2026 Reel 75186, frame 544 | Raffel Systems, LLC; Micro-Air, LLC; Check Technology Solutions LLC | Twin Brook Capital Partners, LLC, as Agent | Security Interest |
Sources
Google Patents · The patent document at USPTO · Assignment records at USPTO
USPTO account required: This application in Patent Center
No maintenance fees are payable on this kind of patent, so the record carries no fee events.
Free plan: 3 watched companies. Pro: unlimited.
Alerts on its grants, lapses and transfers.
What's changing
Jan 2032
Term ends Jan 31, 2032. No maintenance fees are payable on this kind of patent
Citations
66
later US patents cite this one
That is top 10% of design patents granted in 2017 in our data, the only group it is compared against.
How we rank
Every date shows its work: the base term, any term adjustment or extension, any disclaimer cap, and the maintenance fee record, each with a confidence tier. How this record was built
Computed patent terms end on the dates shown. Related patents and pending applications may cover overlapping subject matter.
In force means the term is running and no lapse is on record. It is not a finding that the patent is valid.